SocialSphere, Inc.

You are here:
Home Blogs John's Blog The First Steps of Web 2.0 in Higher Ed
The First Steps of Web 2.0 in Higher Ed
Written by John Della Volpe   
Sunday, 22 March 2009

This blog is coming to you from a pretty good airport bar, Chickie’s and Pete’s in Philadelphia’s C Terminal.  I'm watching the tournament and waiting for the 6:15 pm back to Boston and just wrapped up a talk to several hundred college and university executives who attended the SunGard Higher Education Executive Summit.  I also just saw this ridiculous photo on the wall of the bar’s owner with Jon Bon Jovi – "Dude, What is up with the wig and glasses?"  But I digress …

The objective of my plenary session was threefold – 1) use my research at Harvard IOP and my time as an entrepreneur to talk about what I know about the Millennial generation; 2) shine a light into the future of how Millennials will use Web 2.0 to choose schools and participate on campus; and 3) make people think a little. 

I hope I did my job -- our session ended with hands in the air waiting to ask questions, which I will take as a good sign (rather than a sign that they were terribly confused).  While you can download the presentation at SlideShare – here’s the case I made:

In order to educate, communicate, employ or work productively with Millennials, they need to like you and trust you first.  Building a relationship like this is much easier said than done, which is why I started my talk with 5 facts about the Millennial generation that are critical to understanding where they’re coming from and their place in the world.

5 Facts About Millennials (+ 5 Bonus Ones)
  1. They are the biggest generation in the history of the world.  They account for about 1/3 of the world’s population and 1/4 of U.S. population.
  2. They are spiritual, religious and see themselves as a small part of a much larger global community.
  3. They care deeply about their community.  More than 60% of college students in the U.S. volunteer on a regular basis (and have been doing so for many years).
  4. They crave opportunities to make an impact -- in school, at home, in their communities, at work.  They will help if asked.
  5. They elected a President (and know it). If not for Millennials, Obama loses the Iowa caucus and America would very likely have its first female President.

Of course I also dipped into the tried and true playbook to mention that Millennials also are: digital natives, fierce multi-taskers who crave collaboration, travel in packs, value positive reinforcement -- and at least at Harvard -- don’t mind a good title, recognition or status.  

Definition of Digital Native

Next, before I spoke about the future, I talked (thanks to Jonathan, like always) about the past.  Using a timeline, I attempted to put into context several significant technological advances that shaped the way that Millennials think and interact with technology -- and prepared us all for Facebook and Twitter.  Basically, explained what digital native means and why it's more than a cliche:

1990-1992:  PCs and Macs entered the classroom and curriculum was beginning to develop around computers.  Computers soon became mixed use -- not just for education but they came to be viewed as fun as well.  

Oregon Trail references will still make any 25-30 year old go into fits of nostalgia.

1993-1995:  The PC did not stop in the classroom -- three major developments happened as Millennials entered adolescence that allowed for powerful, revolutionary home computing to occur: Intel’s processor, Windows and Netscape – it was these developments that let Millennials connect with the outside world, but still not with each other.

1997:  AIM changed everything.  AIM allowed Millennials to connect with friends from home for the first time.  Away messages and profiles became an expression of personality -- it really was a Beta version of Facebook and Twitter – perhaps more importantly, it planted the idea that computers were made for social connection, and created a need and desire to be in constant contact with friends even when at home.

1998-2000:  The omnipresence of Google and the ability to search profoundly impacted the way that Millennials view information and changed the way they think -- file directories vs. search features and the idea that the world should be at your fingertips.  In 1999 Napster and later the iPod emerged and with it the notion that content should always be available, not behind walls.

2003-2006:  This is when things exploded -- back to back to back to back -- we saw MySpace, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter introduced spawning thousands of other organic groups and communities dedicated to learning, college, admissions and life on campus. 

What's Next

The consequences of these changes are many – they effect how students learn, how institutions position themselves, and how deans manage (or not) enrollment when new communities like College Confidential, The U and Zinch are competing with, if not replacing, traditional college ranking and search methodologies like the US News and World Report, Education issue.  My only regret is that I did not ring more alarm bells -- I believe that like traditional advertising and email are slowly dying -- so are the traditional enrollment management practices at thousands of institutions. 

I left by teeing up the SocialSphere approach for identifying your influencers and strategies for engaging them -- and a few of what we'd consider best practices so far:

Much more to come on this topic -- very interested in other thoughts -- especially from those at the conference or in this space.  I love comments...

Thanks again to Ken for the introduction and everyone at SunGard -- this was all time well-spent -- look forward to seeing you on campus and at next year's conference.

Trackback(0)
Comments (3)add
...
written by Tom La Fauci , March 23, 2009
It's an excellent blog, a good read. You have your finger on something happening in this country not many seem to fully comprehend.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
...
written by John , March 22, 2009
Chris -- 100% right. Millennials crave authenticity and know it when they see it -- faster than older Americans. Also, yes -- their brains are different. You can not change them -- so best to learn how to deal with it and have a productive relationship -- huge upside. Remember my intro?

We are watching very closely for the next Facebook -- much of the recent Twitter traffic is from older Millennials raised on AIM who made Facebook what it is -- gravitating some to Twitter.

Your last item is much too interesting a topic to comment on in this space -- for that we will have to discuss over dinner or a beer.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by Chris Gill , March 22, 2009
Hi John, thanks for your presentation at Sungard Summit; it was valuable. I was struck by another point that I believe you made (although it could have been someone else - drinking from the firehose) about the importance of authenticity to millennials in terms of building trust with them; they have to believe that you are authentic, which I took to mean that you can be neither disingenuous nor irrelevant to them if you want them to engage. I believe that you said that they have very sensitive "BS meters," which I can completely believe, having a 14 year old daughter.
I was struck by your description of how millennials brains are wired differently from previous generations. To me that means that all the hand wringing about how negative this may be is irrelevant - it's happening and we'd better learn to adapt.
Finally, I was struck by the comments from the mother in the audience about how her son is turned off by all of the parents invading his space on Facebook. Does that mean that millennials are moving one? To where? Any thoughts?
Last item; I'm curious about your thoughts on how an age of overwhelming information abundance should shape higher education. Is it possible that this sense that young people are learning a mile wide and an inch deep really a manifestation of on age of information richness, the long tail, and digital immolation? Is it enough that young people know how to find what they need when they need it rather than building that reservoir of knowledge as a core part of becoming an educated person?
Thanks for engaging!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
Write comment
smaller | bigger

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy